What you get
A risk-ranked set of structural blockers, plus refactoring paths that genuinely remove branches, wrappers, and incidental complexity.
Thermo-Nuclear Review: Zero Tolerance for Structural Debt
Added 2026-08-28An unusually strict maintainability review that looks past “it works” to flag file sprawl, one-off branches, spaghetti flow, thin abstractions, and muddy type boundaries—then hunts for refactors that delete complexity outright.

Starting from the current branch diff, it treats working behavior as the floor rather than the approval bar. The rubric prioritizes structural regressions and code-judo simplifications: files pushed past 1,000 lines, feature checks scattered through shared flows, repeated conditionals, pass-through abstractions, casts or loose types that hide the real contract, and orchestration made sequential or non-atomic without good reason. Its remedies go beyond naming and formatting—decompose modules, return logic to its canonical owner, reshape state around explicit types, collapse duplicate branches, or remove an unnecessary layer entirely. The expected review is small and high-conviction: blocking structural findings first, actionable simplifications next, and no flood of cosmetic nits. Model auto-invocation is disabled, so you call it explicitly; Cursor Team Kit also ships a matching review agent.